Is The 70-300mm Lens Or The 18-200mm Lens Better?

by Roevie on September 21, 2009

Canon 70-300mm lens

The 70-300mm Canon lens (not the DO design) is just this kind of a shock.

Actually, it might be the greatest kept secret amongst photographers. You hardly ever hear anybody proclaiming the greatness of this small lens. The lens is as well unassuming and regular. And yet, whenever you appear deep, you see the subtle praises.

Perhaps it is simply because the lens isn’t amazing to take a look at, and “real” photographers want an attention-getter about the front of their prized digital SLR.

Perhaps it is simply because it is not all that costly, coming in at about $550.

Regardless of the cause, the 70-300mm Canon lens is nicely really worth getting a take a look at.

Picture high quality is ranked by some nicely respected photographers correct up there using the L lens, and that’s amazing.

What you’ll usually see on blogs and forums is how unpretentious the lens really is. Comments like, “I believed it had been a toy,” express the very first impressions of numerous first-time customers.

Nevertheless, the very first impressions aren’t lasting types using this lens. As soon as they shoot a couple of frames, their viewpoint modifications. Following all, the lens sports IS (picture stabilization) and USM (ultrasonic motor), along using the excellent picture high quality currently pointed out. People who disdain the use of the tripod will like these two functions.

My favored story concerning the 70-300mm Canon lens comes from a guy who discovered his lens at a garage sale. Picking it up, he figured he would purchase it for any young relative who was just obtaining began in photography. The seller knew absolutely nothing concerning the overall performance from the lens. So, the photographer buys the lens.

Just to determine if it even functions, he puts it on his Canon 5D to consider a couple of shots. The relative in no way got the lens. This buyer was so impressed with its overall performance, he stated that it had been as well great of the lens to waste on somebody else.

Ken Rockwell experienced this to say concerning the Canon 70-300mm f/4-5.6 IS USM lens, “When I very first picked it up I believed it had been a toy – but when I saw the excellent heavyweight picture high quality, the toy-like lightness became a large advantage.”

Surprises are excellent once they arrive like this. You realize the old saying, “Don’t judge a book by its cover.” Correct of numerous points, such as camera gear.

Nikon 18-200mm lens


Nikon 18-200mm lens is really a compact, featherweight and could be zoomed in about 11.1 variety lens that’s ideal for higher high quality performances, daily photography also it combines the sophisticated functions for example Nikon’s Additional Reduced Dispersion glass, silent wave motor technologies and improved vibration reduction inside a DX-Nikon style for Nikon DX format DSLR cameras.

These kinds of lens are no doubt amazing using the optical versatility functions and improved VRII vibration reduction. This really is an innovation which will excite each and every enthusiast with substantially sharper handheld photos at slower shutter rate. How great can that be? It also provides the unique benefit of having the ability to shoot much more definite and broader array of photos with challenging problems.

Using this new Nikon D90 18-200mm lens VRII, the user has an benefit of getting pictures as shutter speeds incomparable to other people also it can usually consider pictures without having blurring the picture even with camera movements at slow shutter rate. This lens also consists of the greatest Nikon function, the Nikon’s Compact Silent Wave Motor technologies, which binds quick and precise car concentrating with super-quiet overall performance too as internal concentrating, a construction that grant the lens to concentrate without having altering its external size, enhancing balance and general overall performance.

Popularity: 1% [?]

Incoming search terms for the article:

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Twitter
  • Technorati
  • Live
  • LinkedIn
  • MySpace

Related posts:

  1. Is Tamron Af 28-300mm F/3.5-6.3 Xr Di Vc Ld A Good Zoom Lens? It is evident that Tamron struggled very difficult to obtain...
  2. Sigma 120-400mm Camera Lens For Canon 400D? Anybody familar with my operate understands I use Canon cameras...

Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.

{ 4 comments… read them below or add one }

David M September 22, 2009 at 5:34 am

Neither one is a particularly good lens. The Canon versions would be much better especially if you get the IS versions.
That said the 18-200 is probably the most versatile lens in that it goes from wide angle to telephoto.
Personally I feel you would be better off getting the Camera with the Canon 18-55mm IS lens and then getting the Canon EFs 55-250 IS lens. The 18-55mm lens is pretty cheap especially when purchased as a kit with the camera. The 55-250mm IS lens costs about $250 and is better than either of the Tamron lenses.
Here is a link to a couple of packages with Canon lenses. http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/57…http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/58…

screwdri September 22, 2009 at 10:39 am

All lenses have compromises in their design the more zoom range a lens has the more compromises there are, so the 18 – 200mm lens (11X zoom range (200/18)). will have poorer image quality than the 70 – 300mm lens (4X zoom range (300/70)).
On top of that the wide range zooms usually have smaller maximum aperture (its one of the compromises) so that means its a bright day lens, the image in the viewfinder will be so dim the auto focus will just ‘hunt’ when the light is low.
The Sigma 70 – 300mm APO lens is more expensive than the Tamron, but build quality is better and the lens can focus closer at all zoom settings, making the lens a very useful pseudo Macro.
Chris

mrhousto September 22, 2009 at 5:06 pm

depends on what you are looking to use it for. personally, i would use the 18-55 IS kit lens and get a 55-250 IS as that is a little better than the 70-300 since handholding a 70-300 will lead to shake when it is zoomed out, the 18-55 and the 55-250 would make a nice little package and you would benefit from the IS through the ranges. The 18-200 isn’t a bad lens but personally not a fan of the megazoom lenses as they tend to suffer from trying to do too much while maintaining a reasonable size.

jeffy September 22, 2009 at 10:25 pm

The EF-S 18-200mm F3.5-5.6 IS is a lens which many Canon users have been waiting for with great anticipation, as an ideal ‘all-in-one’ lens for travel and ‘walkaround’ use. In the flesh it behaves much as we’d expect from such an ambitious design, as an 11x zoom range will always necessitate some fairly major optical compromises. Wideangle performance is distinctly mediocre due to a combination of barrel distortion, chromatic aberration, and softness at wide apertures; and while the lens is respectably sharp at longer focal lengths, this is tempered by pincushion distortion around 50mm and chromatic aberration at 200mm. However Canon has to be given some credit for providing users with free software which can compensate for those lens aberrations in RAW conversion, although it can’t of course cure underlying sharpness issues.http://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/product/B001E…

Leave a Comment

Previous post:

Next post: