Digital Camera World

Author Archive

This article provides some easy tips landscape photography. The purpose of a landscape photo is to capture the essence of a place. Using these techniques undoubtedly will help do that.

The landscape photos using a wide depth of field. This means that most if not all, of the shot is in focus. There are exceptions to this course, but mostly it's how. The best way is to choose a small aperture setting. A higher number represents a smaller opening, whereas a lower number represents a greater openness. The disadvantage of a small aperture is that less light will reach the image sensor. You will have to either increase the shutter speed or increase the ISO (or both).

Since it is more likely to use a longer shutter speed to let more light into the camera, you have to keep the camera still for a relatively long period of time. Any movement will cause blurring. You might even want to consider investing in a wireless or cable release to ensure that the camera does not move. A lightweight tripod is a must if you are planning on doing a lot of walking. Another side effect of having a large tripod is that it forces you to take your time when creating a shot.

While we normally think of a landscape photography as focused on landscape, still a good idea to have some kind of focal point. Some examples are an interesting tree in the foreground, a farm animal grazing in a field, a barn on the horizon, etc. This gives the shot more interesting and a place for the viewer's eye to rest. The focal point is not to be completely clear, however, use your imagination here.

If you have a focal point in the landscape (and should), how will direct the viewer's eye to it? One of the best and easiest ways to accomplish this is to use the lines. For example, lines in a path may result in its focus to a particular point. The lines have the added benefit of providing the depth and interest to your account for a shot.

Landscapes are not always just on the merits. Sometimes, having an object in the foreground helps create a sense of depth in the draft. It also helps the viewer is inserted into the picture, figuratively speaking of course.

Landscapes that do not have a dominant foreground, generally have an interesting sky in them. If the photo lacks both, chances are that it looks pretty boring. But having the sky in the photo can also hurt if it's boring, monotonous, and cloudless. If that is the cause, do not fill most of the structure of it. Moreover, looking at the clouds when the sky is interesting or a spectacular sunset, definitely low on the horizon as the sky fills most of the shot.

The technical part of photography is not difficult to understand, anyone who wants to learn can do it. For a basic understanding of the cameras used in photography there are only four key areas that you must understand to move forward. This is the ISO, shutter speed, aperture and lighting. This is part 4 of this series of digital camera controls and treated with the control session, the lighting.

LIGHTING

The theme of light in photography is a very large area and can go days, months and even years studying its characteristics and its use in photography. There are two major areas that interest us, the ambient light and flash light. Atmosphere is what gives us the sun and the flash is what we use in the study or the flash that comes with the camera.

Understanding light is vital for making your photographs work well. If you use the hard light drama to emphasize the shape or the use of soft lighting to make a most attractive portrait will have significant consequences for their photographs.

Photography is all about light, some people mentioned photography as painting with light. You must understand the light so you can manipulate the camera functions to enhance your photos.

This does not mean, of course, to get the right lighting is the most important feature to take a good photograph and experienced photographers will tell you that to achieve a good-looking image that needs good light. It's for you to recognize and manipulate these characteristics as deemed appropriate.

For example, using the soft light of midday and no interest will not flatter the landscape photography. The choice of shooting at night or at dawn will bring the drama and the level of impact of photography substantially.

What is a good light? What is bad light? What makes a photograph another stunning look and ordinary people?

The answer depends largely on the subject and its environment. Are you in the studio or at home, or are you in the wild. Either way you have to control the light that is available in the studio with flash or other lighting and outside, the sun. All of these lighting situations must be managed and monitored carefully. Your photo is highly dependent on lighting conditions.

These items, in its brevity, I can not tell one or two pages how to get great pictures with the lighting that the subject of this or that. The theme of light must be explored on a deeper level. If you take the step of photographs average, these camera controls will help enormously. But if you want to take the next step in creative photography, pursuing the study of light in detail.

2008 was an interesting year for digital SLR photographers in general, even if one ignores the ultra-high-end ads Leica Hassleblad and Red. The three main players in the DSLR space (Nikon and Canon, each with around 40% market share and Sony with 10%) all the cameras turning up. Here are their successes and failures.

Nikon

After his release in 2007 with the revolutionary Nikon D3 and D300, will put the bar high for 2008, but generally did not disappoint with four new bodies:

Nikon D60

Although not revolutionary, the Nikon D60 replaces the D40x in Nikon lineup of consumers in a smaller package better, becoming one of the smallest and lightest DSLR ever made.

Nikon D700

Coming almost a total surprise, the Nikon D700 was launched in mid-summer, which contains the full frame 12 megapixel D3 star, but with a body similar to D300. At $ 3,000, this camera was the Nikon FX commitment, and the camera instantly became the choice of many professionals who do not need the closing time, or the advanced features of the D3 (for example wedding photographers).

However, few months after its launch, the A900 from Sony came out with a 24 megapixel sensor full-frame MSRP for it, and the Canon 5D Mark II came out with a full frame sensor of 21 megapixels and video HD 1080p for $ 2,700.

Although the D700 is still the most complete package (better autofocus, and arguably the best measurement for most of 12 megapixels is enough), which has been under strong pressure from his rivals megapixels. Just four months after its launch, street prices have fallen 25% to the range of $ 2,300 for a U.S. model.

Nikon D90

Replacing the Nikon D80 in the lineup, the Nikon D90 took the D300 sensor respected, improved slightly, add video, and packaged in a small, lightweight body with scene modes and a more basic autofocus and metering.

The Nikon D90 was also the worlds first DSLR to feature video capture HD with its 720p/24 fps mode. However, a few weeks later Canon announced an offer of much more complete video with her Canon 5D Mark II, and the video remains the weakest element of the D90, lacking autofocus and gives very little control over key elements such as exposure.

A $ 999, this company helped Nikon lineup of consumers, creating a consumer DSLR exceptionally able progress in the Nikon D90.

Nikon D3x

After years of rumors, Nikon finally announced megapixel camera is high, the Nikon 24-Megapixel D3x.

The camera immediately provoked a violent reaction to its price of $ 8,000, which at the time of the release was almost double the selling price of the Nikon D3. This was the only fueled further scandal when it was revealed the only significant difference between the D3 and D3x were the sensor and the EXPEED processor slightly improved, combined with the fact Sony can produce a digital SLR camera with the same sensor size a megapixel only $ 3,000.

This camera is aimed squarely at the studio or landscape photographer, and initial tests have shown that the sensor is clean at high ISO than the Sony (but comparable with the 5D Mark II, which has fewer megapixels). So while it is clearly an impressive camera, remains to be seen how many photographers can really justify the price.

Canon

Apart from a certain entry level DSLR, you had two major launches in 2008.

Canon EOS 50D

Replacing the 40D, the Canon 50D filed a 15-megapixel sensor 1.6x crop, so it is now the highest density of available pixels (equivalent to a 39 megapixel sensor, full frame).

However, the initial reception has not been particularly positive.Due to the high density of pixels, the camera suffers more the effects of diffraction, it has high ISO capabilities of many expected it would, and shows the problems with the lenses, more than any previous model. However, it remains a solid camera in its current selling price of just over $ 1,000.

Canon EOS 5D Mark II

Probably the most significant release of the year, replacing Canon 5D incorporates a 21-megapixel sensor Full Frame, similar to ISO capability new Nikon D3x, and became the first DSLR to feature 1080p HD video capture. Despite some initial problems (like the famous "black spot" of the problem), for $ 2700 from Canon provides an impressive feature set, and seems to have hit a home run with what is possibly the best prosumer package on the market today day.

Sony

After consolidating its consumer line, Sony was after the advanced user market with the A900 Sony 24-megapixel full-frame sensor for less than $ 3,000.

Sony A900

The camera lacks basic elements expected today as Live View DSLR, but the next available camera with 24 megapixels is the $ 8,000 Nikon D3x. However, the biggest competition comes from the Canon 5D Mark II, which has a slightly lower resolution at 21 megapixels, but more than makes up for its lower price of $ 2,700, 1080p HD video mode and features such as Live View.

While clearly an impressive camera a solid price, unless you really need the extra resolution would be very difficult to choose the Sony over the Canon.

Abstract

With the cameras pioneered the Nikon D3x, Nikon D90, Canon 50D and Canon 5D Mark II, 2008 solidified full-frame sensors on the market, witnessed a continuous momentum towards more megapixels, and saw the introduction of video in DSLR's.

Looking ahead, 2009 should be an interesting year. With the adverse economic situation and fierce competition for market share, we should see prices fall, and applications like video mature several interesting, though not innovative cameras in the near future.

I love photography and I bought a Canon EOS XSi (450D) last year from amazon.fr. How I wished I had waited like Canon are about to launch its brand to a new successor, T1i Canon EOS (500D), which is very soon (early May 2009).

The XSi is a fantastic camera for the price and really builds the bridge between the amateur photographer and professional photographer as well. I thought I could not improve on it to be honest.

But they have. Oh, how nice they are.

The EOS T1i offers so much for its price. Canon has incorporated many features found on the EOS 5D Mk II (which normally costs over $ 2500) and packaged in the body of the T1i. And guess what? The dimensions are exactly the same as the XSi before (except the weight is 5g heavier).

What does the T1i have on the XSi?

The T1i has 15.1 mega pixels (compared with only 12.2).

More advanced DIGIC 4 processor (compared to the DIGIC III XSi).

The ISO range is expandable to 12,800 compared to only 1600.

The video recording mode – can be used as a video camera, shooting up to 12 minutes (or 4GB) of full HD video!

The HDMI connection for viewing and playing high definition.

A unique feature that really interests me greatly is that the T1i has a great feature for beginners – Auto Creative zone. When set to one of these areas, the camera will guide you as to what settings to use via the LCD. Basically, creative auto mode is like having a built in teacher! I'm tempted to trade in my old T1i XSi and buy just for this feature alone!

Many other standard features of the Canon cameras are still there, including Live View, Auto sensor cleaner, dust and so on and storage is SD or SDHC cards.

Abstract:

I'm looking forward to the release of this camera in early May and will have to talk my wife into allowing me to update my existing XSi. This really looks like a crack house.

It seems that Canon has once again leapt ahead and incorporating new technologies to many in a body so small and low prices. I can not think what to do next, despite Wi-Fi printing transfers and would be good. Need a fast connection to the highest quality images RAW will be well in excess of 20 MB.

The XSi seemed to be a bridge between amateur and professional, but the beat seems T1i including a built in teacher! There is nothing worse than being out on the field after reading something, and then forgotten. The T1i will ask what to do with creative automatically.

Perhaps they also incorporate a mobile phone camera too! Who knows, stranger things have happened!

Introduction:

The full frame DSLR market is heating up – at the end of year three major suppliers, Nikon, Canon and Sony, all have Full Frame DSLR prosumer market all at a similar price.

The 12.1 megapixel Nikon D700, based on the proven technology of both the Nikon D3 and Nikon D300 was announced in July and is now available. With an initial suggested retail price of $ 2999.95, just 3 months after its announcement of street prices have dropped to around $ 2750 mark.

Rumors for months, 24.6 megapixel Sony Alpha A900 was finally officially announced on Sept. 9 with an MSRP of $ 2999.95, and must be submitted within the next few weeks.

A few days later, Canon announced 21.1 megapixel Canon EOS 5D Mark II, which offers a very complete feature set, and the addition of 1080p HD video, while undercutting both the Nikon and Sony with its MSRP $ 2699.99. The camera should ship by the end of the year.

Three very different cameras, all priced very similarly to an interesting option for the consumer or professional up to $ 3,000 to spend on a prosumer DSLR.

Nikon D700:

The Nikon D700 has a great year of age of the Nikon D3 sensor in a body similar to the Nikon D300. With the package optional MB-D10 battery pack (which also fits the Nikon D300), the D700 you can achieve an impressive 8 fps, while the capture of 14-bit files, at least until the buffer is full.

High ISO performance of the D700 is excellent, just like the Nikon D3. The Nikon D700 also has been shown autofocus and metering. However, lower resolution camera on the group to only 12 megapixels, and that turns off a lot of potential buyers.

Canon EOS 5D Mark II:

The 21.1 Megapixel sensor has a resolution similar to Canon's flagship EOS 1Ds Mark III, however, has a much wider ISO range. In fact, its ISO range that exceeds even the Nikon D3 and D700 at ISO 50-25,600 (versus ISO 100-25,600 for Nikon).

The sensor on the 5D Mark II is a new year that the sensor of the D700, and if the capacity of low light come even close to the Nikon D700, Canon has a very compelling camera in your hands with a much higher resolution on the Nikon. There are very few floating round sample images from Canon, so it is too early to be sure, but Canon has great potential – we will soon see the difference that an extra year of development of sensors does.

The new feature of the Canon is the way to 1080p HD video. For many, this feature is a gimmick at best, but for some it is a very powerful tool – the ability to use a significant range of high quality lenses, and have control over depth of field that simply does not exist in the chambers consumer video today. This will be a major selling point for some, and a nice to have for many.

Sony Alpha A900:

The Sony offers the highest resolution of the three chambers, but falls short in two areas: Its ISO performance is significantly smaller than its main rivals, and only has 12 bit A / D conversion. For the vast majority of shooters, the 12-bit A / D will not do much, if the difference in the real world. The problem is more perception, a $ 3000 full frame DSLR is almost expected to have 14-bit A / D conversion on the market today.

Comparison of the cameras:

You drive in his luxury car, and your neighbor first question asks: "How horsepower that has been achieved?" With the cameras, is megapixels – right or wrong, it will be the major selling point for the average consumer, with ISO capabilities very closely.

In reality, very few photographers need more than 12 megapixels.If you are publishing on the web, 3 megapixels is more than enough – my large monitor, 1920 by 1200 is about 2.3 megapixels. An HDTV 1080p is less than 2.1 megapixels.

Most high-quality prints are printed at 300 dpi (dots per inch), 150 dpi prints still look very good. At 300 dpi, an 8×10 photo requires little more than 7 megapixels. A 16×20 print at 150 dpi also requires 7.2 megapixels. How many people who buy these cameras are going to print beyond that?

The main advantage of more megapixels is the ability of crops. This is especially useful for nature, wildlife and sports photographers who need to reach as much as possible. What matters is the density of pixels – the more pixels on target "that you get with your lens longer, can be harvested and more effective way to reach the one you have. However, none of these cameras have the highest pixel density out there – if you need to get there, you would be better served with a Nikon D300 or the new Canon 50D. For the same density of pixels of the Canon 50D in a full-frame sensor, you need a camera full frame with nearly 40 megapixels.

Like it or not, the attribute of the camera that makes the headlines is the number of megapixels. From a marketing perspective, it makes the Nikon D700 at a great disadvantage to the Canon 5D Mark II. On paper, the Canon also wins in the race of the ISO, but only a little. Until the camera is there in the market, we will not know for sure how good low-ISO performance. The Canon also has 1080p Video, which as noted above, will be a major selling point for some, and irrelevant to others.

When the Nikon wins a Canon, is almost everywhere that counts: It has a higher maximum frame rate (especially if you add the MB-D10 grip for 8fps, more than twice the fees), and the role also has a superior AF system and metering system. In the same way that more horsepower does not make sense if the car can not put that power on the road (think transmission, suspension, tires, traction control), the Nikon D700 is still a very compelling package, especially for those who shoot sports or action.

The Sony A900 megapixel wins the race, but the Canon is very close. However, when it loses big factor in the performance of ISO. Canon also has a much wider range of high quality lenses for backup camera, and offers 14-bit A / D conversion 12-bit verses from Sony for those seeking a quality final image. It also has video support, and is about 10% cheaper, so it effectively makes the Canon A900 from Sony and was not for most people.

Then go back to Nikon versus Canon. Both companies have a wide range of professional quality lenses and other accessories for backup camera. The Nikon is the clear choice for the marksman. The landscape or studio photographer lean towards the additional resolution offered by Canon. If the ISO performance is similar in both the Nikon D700 and Canon 5D Mark II, then for the wedding photographer and photojournalist who need low-light capabilities, additional resolution of Canon will give you the edge. Unless, that is, specifically do not want to deal with larger image files (takes up more space on memory cards, and to upload, post more in process, etc).

For everyone else, either the Nikon or Canon must meet or, more likely than their needs, however, Canon has the advantage of marketing with the main number. If you've spent much time shooting in public, then you know that someone will come to you at some point and say "good camera, how many megapixels is that thing have?"